logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.20 2017노622
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below is too uneasy and unfair.

Judgment

In that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration of 0.13% conflict with the damaged vehicle by driving a signal violation under the influence of alcohol and suffered from the driver's injury in need of two weeks of treatment, the crime is very heavy.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s primary offender, the fact that the Defendant’s driving vehicle is subscribed to an automobile comprehensive insurance (Evidence No. 45-46 of the evidence record), the Defendant agreed with the investigative agency, and the Defendant’s wife was the victim (proponed by the evidence No. 23-25 of the trial record, No. 58-61 of the evidence record), the victim’s injury is relatively minor, and other sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow