logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.11.07 2014고합94
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall publish or publicly announce any false fact with respect to a candidate, his/her spouse, lineal ascendant or descendant, or sibling, in a manner unfavorable to a candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communication, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or other means, with the intention of preventing a candidate from being elected.

Nevertheless, the Defendant stated to the effect that, on April 15, 2014, the 6th nationwide local election C, the Defendant claimed support from the above G and G in the election office of the 6th nationwide local election campaign preliminary candidate candidate G in the 3th local election at the 6th local election campaign office of the 3th local election of the 3rd local council members, and that, on May 12, 2014, the above G provided 300,000 won in cash at the J’s house.” The Defendant stated to the effect that “E candidate claimed support from the above G and G in the 6th local election campaign office of the 3rd local council candidates in the 3rd local election of the 3rd local council members.”

4. Around October, 100, at the I coffee shop, J requested support from the J, provided a set of money and 300,000 won in cash at the J House on the 12th of the same month, and the K police station investigation is under the investigation, so the content of the statement was reported through the LInternet news.

However, there was no fact that the above E provided 300,000 won in cash to J around April 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendant published false information for the purpose of preventing preliminary candidates E from being elected at the 6th nationwide local election C, Dong local election C, Dong local election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning J and E;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against J and E;

1. Each police statement of M and G;

1. Prosecution investigation reports (Attachment of LInternet News Articles Related to this case);

1. A report on internal investigation by the police (Attachment of the content of recording);

1. Regarding the re-verification of a place in which the police investigation report was cashed by the J, the suspect J's apartment house ctv. Confirmation investigation, and the suspect J

4.1. through 1.1.

4. up to 14. The criminal investigation;

arrow