logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.11.07 2014고합620
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 90,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 70,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and B participated in the election campaign and election campaign in the 6th nationwide election of Dong-si local government, which was implemented on June 4, 2014, at the 6th nationwide election of Dong-dong local government, as the I Party candidate. Defendant A registered at the election office of Defendant B from April 15, 2014 to May 19, 2014 and carried out an election campaign as the election campaign manager from May 19, 2014 to the election day, and the said Defendants were to request the recruitment of persons to deliver the competition campaign and receive money from the I Party competition that was carried out over this mold from May 10 to 11, 2014.

On April 2014, Defendant B offered KRW 200,000,000 to the J, who recruited a person to be mobilized in the competition campaign to Defendant B at K L Hospital located at the end of April 2014.

Defendant

A, at the same date and at the same place, 20,000 won received from Defendant B, as above, was put to J in the name of the 6th nationwide election campaign.

As a result, the above Defendants conspired to make a contribution act for Defendant B, who is a candidate for the 6th nationwide local election, in relation to the election, and paid money and valuables to J, who is a person involved in the competition campaign, to select Defendant B as a candidate at the competition line within the 6th national provincial election.

B. On May 18, 2014, Defendant B had M transfer KRW 600,00 to Defendant A’s corporate bank account on May 18, 2014, and Defendant A “5.10; and

5. 11. 11. Statement that money was paid to J as the price for the public opinion poll conducted.

Defendant

A around May 18, 2014, around NJ's house, 500,000 won was 50,000 won to J as a consideration for the 6th nationwide election campaign.

Accordingly, the above Defendants conspired to make contributions for Defendant B in relation to the election.

arrow