1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including those resulting from the participation, shall be all included.

1. Basic facts

(a) The land survey division under the Land Survey Order in the Japanese Occupation Period is indicated as the owner of the JW 285 square meters in Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun, Yang Sung-gun, Seoul, and H, whose domicile is in the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the

B. The answer 285 square meters in Yang-gun-gun, Gyeonggi-do was 942 square meters in Guri-si through the conversion of the area and the change of the name of the administrative district.

C. The registration of ownership transfer in the name of K was completed on January 8, 1958, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the supplementary intervenor was completed on the ground of the donation made on August 16, 1990.

L, the permanent domicile of Jongno-gu Seoul, died on February 4, 1915, and succeeded to Australia and property, and N, on November 15, 1972, died of the Plaintiffs and children, and Nonparty P, the wife of which succeeded to the shares of 2/13, the shares of 6/13, the shares of 6/13, the shares of 4/13, the shares of 6/13, the shares of 4/13, the shares of 4/13, the shares of 1/13, the shares of 1/13, and the shares of 1/13, among the shares of 2/13, the shares of O, the shares of 6/11, the shares of 4/11, and the shares of 1/111, respectively.

E. On April 5, 2013, P and Plaintiff B donated Plaintiff B and P the entire inheritance share of the instant real estate to Plaintiff B, 11/117, which is the entire inheritance share of the instant real estate, and entered into a gift agreement with Plaintiff B to increase the inheritance share.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including branch numbers in case of additional number), entry of Eul evidence 3, purport of whole pleadings

2. In the absence of counter-proofs, such as changes in the contents of the assessment by the adjudication, the person registered as the owner of the land in the judgment on the cause of the claim shall be presumed to have been determined as the owner of the land, and shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive. The presumption of preservation of ownership shall be broken if it is found that a person other than the title holder

Supreme Court Decision 208No. 24, 2008