1. On October 25, 2016, the National Labor Relations Commission filed an application for reexamination between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor for reexamination.

The details and details of the decision on re-examination were established on August 4, 2001 by the Intervenor and the Defendant’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) and run passenger transport service by employing more than 130 full-time workers.

On January 11, 2010, the plaintiff was employed by the intervenor and served as a bus driver.

On March 24, 2016, an intervenor rendered a 60-day disposition of suspension from office to the Plaintiff for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure”).

① From the end of April 2015 to June 2015, the Plaintiff reported to the administrative agency that “the Intervenor filed an excessive report on the distance for the operation of the Changwon- Busan metropolitan transit route to the Gyeongnam-do, and received the fuel subsidy unjustly, and operated differently from the route of the bus route approved by the Intervenor,” thereby impairing the Intervenor’s external image and reputation.

② On December 5, 2015, around 11:30 on December 5, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) abused the order of the workplace by making use of intimidation with the content of “to kill and kill, first, to kill and die, and other fellows.”

③ Even if the Plaintiff was sufficiently educated on the method of mooring the route in charge of the new operation from December 1, 2015 to December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff refused to give instructions to take over the route on December 10, 2015, and accordingly, the Plaintiff caused economic loss to the Intervenor due to the failure of the vehicle to be operated by the Plaintiff.

④ On January 12, 2016, when the Plaintiff operates a bus on a route-C (C), the Plaintiff entered the bus terminal riding home at around 17:57 after waiting the bus on a route-based bus terminal. However, the time of departure was more than 18:00, but the Plaintiff arrived at the bus terminal boarding home at around 17:57. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered economic damage to the Intervenor by operating the bus on an open lane without carrying passengers up until the bus stop.