1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part arising from the participation in the lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company with the purpose of wholesale and retail business of electric parts, and the defendant is a company with the purpose of wholesale and retail business of household appliances.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a company with the purpose of manufacturing and selling household appliances for home appliances for home appliances for home appliances.

B. From January 2015 to December 2016, the Plaintiff and the Intervenor entered into a transaction with the content that the Plaintiff imported a team cleaning machine, etc. and supplied it to the intervenors, and that the Plaintiff was paid by the Intervenor.

From September 25, 2003, the defendant has been provided with the studs cleaning machine, etc. from the intervenor to the date of September 25, 2003, and has been engaged in transactions with the intervenor with the contents of payment to

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

가. 원고와 참가인 사이의 채권양도담보계약 체결 1) 원고와 참가인은 2015. 9. 초순경부터 원고가 참가인에게 사업자금을 대여하여 주는 계약을 체결하기 위하여 교섭을 진행하면서, 참가인이 원고에게 대여금 및 물품대금에 관한 담보를 먼저 제공하기로 약정하였다. 2) 원고는 2015. 9. 23. 모회사인 주식회사 다산네트웍스(이하 ‘다산네트웍스’라 한다) 명의로 참가인과 사이에, 참가인이 피고 등 거래처에 대하여 가지고 있는 매출채권을 다산네트웍스에게 양도담보로 제공하기로 하는 내용의 계약을 체결하였다.

3) 원고와 참가인은 위 계약을 분명히 하기 위하여 2015. 12. 24. 참가인이 피고 등 거래처에 대하여 가지고 있는 매출채권을 다산네트웍스에게 양도담보로 제공한다는 취지가 기재된 물품공급합의서(갑 제1호증 을 작성하였다.

B. On September 24, 2015, the intervenor notified the intervenor of the assignment of claims against the defendant against the defendant, provided the defendant with a "afterward sales claim as a collateral for transfer in full to the plaintiff."