logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.30 2018노4750
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal [misunderstanding of facts] does not insult the victim as described in the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On July 22, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is how the Defendant collected E, F, and G, an apartment resident of the same apartment located in the D Dda located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is a major apartment resident of the same apartment, “I am good if the method of death of the dog would have been well thought, in order to dule at the time of the death of pulse.”

Patently insulting “Magin”.

B. The lower court also asserted the same purport as the above grounds for appeal, and the lower court, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, acknowledged the fact that the Defendant insultingd the victim as indicated in the facts charged.

The decision is made and the defendant's assertion was rejected.

(c)

In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the court below's decision to this purport is just and acceptable, and there is no illegality of misconception of facts as alleged by the defendant, as otherwise alleged in the facts charged.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

(1) The victim consistently made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the defendant was able to enter the area E, F, G and D, and thereafter he was able to sit like I as stated in the facts charged.” The above statement is a concrete, reasonable, objective and reasonable statement to the effect that it is believed that the content thereof is specific, reasonable, and objective.

See I stated very concretely in the court of the court below about the reasons why the defendant entered the D multilaterals, the fact that the defendant made the same remarks as the facts charged, and the present situation, and the main contents thereof conform to the victim's statement.

arrow