The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors) does not insult the victim by making the victim’s words identical to the entries in the facts charged, at the same place where E, etc. is located on the date of the facts charged.

2. In light of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, the victim consistently testified from the investigative agency to the lower court that the Defendant made an insulting speech, such as the facts charged, with respect to himself/herself, from the time of the instant case to the court of the lower court, and the fact that, from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, the E at the time of the instant case, the Defendant stated to the effect that “the victim is a person with bad credit standing, a person with bad credit standing, or a person with bad credit standing,” a relatively consistent statement for the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.