The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error or misapprehension of the legal principle) is that the defendant only met with the victim, and was pushed ahead to prevent the victim from becoming more severe, and the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles.

Judgment

The court below duly admitted and examined the following circumstances, namely, (a) the defendant stated that he was the victim's head at the time of the investigation by the prosecution; (b) the victim was the victim's body in the process of the investigation by the defendant and the victim's head; and (c) the victim was the victim's body in the process of leaving the defendant first at the time of the victim's head; and (d) the victim was the victim's body in the process of leaving the victim's head at the time of leaving the victim's body, and the victim was the victim's body in the process of leaving the victim's body again; and (e) the victim was the victim's body in the process of leaving the victim's head at the time of leaving the victim's body, and (e) the court below argued that the victim was the victim's body at the time of leaving the victim's body and the victim's statement at the time of leaving the victim's body, but the victim was the victim's statement at the time of leaving the victim's body and the victim's statement.

Furthermore, as to whether the Defendant’s act stated in the instant facts charged constitutes self-defense.