1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following: (a) the Defendant’s assertion emphasized or added by this court; and (b) thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main text of

2. Additional determination, etc.

A. 1) Part 1 as of October 24, 2014, 2014, which is the second 13th th th th th 13th th th th th th 2014 of the judgment of the first instance, was recognized as the date on which the check number per unit was prepared in the first instance court as of October 20, 2014, but this court was organized as of October 24, 2014 as the fact that there is no dispute between the parties. 2) The check number G “I”, “as of the second 14th th th th th th 14th,” was Z, 3) the 5th 20-21th th 21th th th 20 to 21th st 20 of the judgment of the first instance, and the 1st th th 2th th 20th th 1st notarial note “this case’s notarial note” was prepared.

B. On October 20, 2014, the date of preparation of the notarial deed of the Promissory Notes in the case of which the Defendant’s assertion was made, and the date of actual preparation is deemed to have been October 24, 2014, and thus, it appears that the notarial deed of the instant Promissory Notes appears to have been made for any reason different from the notarial deed of the instant case, and that there was a continuous transaction relationship between E and the Defendant, but there was no reason to require special security only regarding the notarial deed of the instant case. The Defendant was indicted for fraud or was subject to non-prosecution disposition.