Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2012, the Defendants, at the request of the victim H, revealed that the victim H was aware of the fact that the victim was a person with intellectual disability, who had been her husband and her husband with respect to G, and had a friendly relationship with the victim.

The Defendants do not appear to be a normal person even if they receive a snick of snick with intellectual disabilities, but, if they have intellectual disabilities, they are likely to lead an intangible life even if they are unable to grow themselves, and even if they knew of the fact that there is no need to receive a snick of snick of a woman, the Defendants are snick of snick of their body.

The purpose of this article is to make it possible for a married couple to take a normal and to live in an unlimited life, so that the victim cannot be required to exercise his/her right to demand the payment of the expenses for the transfer of the right to demand the payment of the expenses.

On April 28, 2012, the Defendants found the victim’s husband’s her husband of the victim located in K in Bosan-si, and acquired 91,350,000 won by deceiving the victim more than 12 times as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table of the crime, by stating that “I will die, salle, salle, salle. salle. salle. salle. salle. sn. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. n. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s

2. Defendant B, on March 27, 2013, set up and set up on the ground that Defendant B she did not want to be free of charge in M law parties located in L in Seosan-si, on the ground that he she had sexual intercourse with the victimJ (In this case, 41 years of age). Defendant B, on the other hand, provided that the part of the victim’s patriarch part of the victim’s patriarch was several times, resulting in a gambling room requiring two weeks of treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement made by the Defendants in the fifth protocol of the trial that fit them;

1. Statements made with the witness H in the second protocol of the trial;

1. N of witnesses in the third protocol of trial;