The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the defendant misunderstanding of facts in the judgment of the court below has supported the beer's disease at the time and place of crime as stated in the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, although the above beer's disease was adjacent to the victim's injury or was not aware of the victim

B. The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts is consistent from the investigative agency to this court, but he denies the crime by asserting that the beer's disease was not in contact with the victim's care or around his entrance. Thus, according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant can be recognized as having received dental treatment with the victim with the shoulderer on the day of the crime of this case. Furthermore, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the records as follows: the victim consistently asserted from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that the defendant's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's beer's appearance.