logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.07 2015고단893 (2)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On January 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 28, 2015.

[2] The Defendant did not have money to return the security deposit to the revenue in order to sell the house within the country from “C main points” located in the Yasan-si B around October 2013.

Accordingly, the new party has entered into a false lease contract at the above house to obtain a loan. Accordingly, it is intended to refund the deposit to the existing revenue with the money, sell the house, and pay the loan with the purchase price, and lend the remainder to the party.

Upon receipt of the proposal and consent thereto, the Defendant concluded a false lease contract with the Defendant as a lessee and conspired with D to obtain a loan from a financial institution.

D around February 2, 2014, around Gwangju-gu E Apartment 202 Dong 402, the owner F, proposed to purchase the above apartment, on the ground that the purchase fund is insufficient, and the Defendant first proposed to purchase the above apartment as a condition to enter into a lease agreement on the above apartment. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant, upon D’s instructions, drafted a lease agreement for the above apartment with the lessee as the Defendant, with the lessee KRW 140,000,000,000,000,000,000.

On February 25, 2014, according to D’s instructions, the Defendant continuously applied for the Home Loan of KRW 92 million to the employees in charge of the above branch loan at the location of the Korea Life Insurance Co., Ltd. located in Gwangju, applying for the above lease contract and set up a pledge against the victim company on the claim to return the lease deposit.

However, the defendant actually leased the above apartment and had no intention to reside therein, and D is the victim.

arrow