logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.02 2016고정32
대기환경보전법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an entity that produces metal machinery products in Orcheon-gu C, Ocheon-si, Ocheon-si, and operates “D”.

1. A Mayor/Do Governor shall report to the Mayor/Do Governor on the emission facilities of air pollutants other than those subject to permission for installation prescribed by Presidential Decree among the emission facilities that install non-reported fraud;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not report to the branch office of Gyeonggi-do, and installed two types of frauds, which are air pollutants using 50 power-driven power alternately from January 2013 to August 28, 2015, and operated the discharge facilities using the discharge facilities.

2. Discharge facilities other than those subject to permission for installation prescribed by Presidential Decree among wastewater discharge facilities shall be reported to the Minister of Environment;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without reporting to the Minister of Environment, installed six metal processing machines indicated in the List of Attached Crimes, which are wastewater discharging facilities that reuse wastewater in circulation of the date, time, place, and water-saving oil, etc. mentioned in paragraph (1), and operated them using such discharging facilities.

3. He/she shall report to the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province branch office, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu on emission facilities other than those subject to the permit for installation prescribed by Presidential Decree, among noise and vibration emission facilities

Nevertheless, without reporting to the Busan City Mayor, the Defendant installed one of the Na-type air compressers (the so-called "comsaw" and the model name: E), which is the date, time, place, and noise and vibration emission facilities of 50 M&C, at the place specified in paragraph (1), and operated the facility using such emission facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant on the second public trial date;

1. Investigation reports (Reporting on detection of violations, such as the Air Environment Conservation Act);

1. Application of statutes, such as a written confirmation;

1. Article 90 subparagraph 1 of the Act on the Conservation of the Air Environment and Articles 90 and 23 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Facts, the water quality, and the like;

arrow