A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2010, the Defendant sentenced ten months to imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 24, 201.

[2013Kadan2362] On April 26, 2013, the Defendant, at around 03:14, by the victim D in Suwon-si, ordered alcohol, etc., by deceiving the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price in a normal manner even if he/she ordered alcohol, and by deceiving the victim as if he/she did not pay the price in a normal manner, he/she did not receive 1 disease, 14 disease, etc. from the victim and did not pay the price in an amount equivalent to 262,70 won.

[2013 Highest 6655] On October 28, 2013, the Defendant, at the H main point operated by the Victim G in Suwon-si F in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she orders alcohol, thereby inducing the victim to pay the price normally, and even if he/she received 160,000 won from the victim, he/she did not pay the price, but did not receive the amount of 160,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

【Prior Records at the Time of Sales】

1. Criminal records (Evidence Nos. 5 of evidence 2013 Highest 2362);

1. A criminal investigation report by the prosecution (revolving repeated crimes and reporting of confirmation) (Article 2013 high-ranking 2362 Evidence List 6) (2013 high-ranking 2362);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Summary receipt;

1. Business license certificate (2013 high-level 6655);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The defense counsel on the assertion of the receipt counsel argues to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of each of the crimes in this case. However, in light of the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, the method and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions by drinking alcohol at the time of each of the crimes in this case

. was in or weak condition.