beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The Defendants asserted that they conspired with E to prepare a report containing the following false information (hereinafter “the report of this case”), and Defendant C is the president, and Defendant D signed it as the vice president, and the Plaintiff Company ceased to engage in transactions with Daeyangex Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Mayangex”). The Defendants spread the above false information around them, thereby undermining the Plaintiff Company’s credit, and during that process, Plaintiff B suffered considerable mental distress as the representative director of the Plaintiff Company.
① The Plaintiff Company prepared the instant report based on false facts that high level of salt salt is generated in the carter that is supplied to the Daeyangex, and that, as a result, the fact that the gold products produced by the Taeyangex will cause inferior products.
(hereinafter “instant assertion”). (2) A false statement on August 6, 2013, which was the date of preparation of the instant report.
(hereinafter “instant assertion” (hereinafter “instant assertion”). (3) The Plaintiff Company supplied to Daeyang-Ttex stated “MAE INCHINA” as “MADINA,” and it is also false that the Plaintiff supplied the Plaintiff Company to Taeyang-Ttex.
(2) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff Company for consolation money of KRW 1.5 million out of the supply loss amount of KRW 300 million from August 2013 to May 2014, 201, the total amount of KRW 20 million due to the decline in the credit of the Plaintiff Company, and KRW 1.5 million, and KRW 20 million for consolation money of KRW 1 million for the Plaintiff Company B.
2. Determination
A. 1) Whether the instant report is false or not the instant case’s report is based on the test report prepared by the president of the Korea Testing and Research Institute Nos. 1-1 to 4 on September 12, 2013 (as for evidence Nos. 1-1 to 4, “KS M 9127:209: 209”, the Plaintiff Company is salted in the car-type pen supplied by the Plaintiff Company.