logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.02.11 2014가단4316
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant prepared a report stating the following false facts (hereinafter "the report of this case") and reported it to the representative director of the B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "B"), and thus the transaction between the plaintiff and B was suspended. The defendant spreads the above false facts to the contrary, thereby causing damage to the plaintiff's credit decline.

Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages for KRW 20 million out of the supply loss amount of KRW 30 million from August 2013 to May 2014, 2014, KRW 10,000, KRW 300,000 in total, and damages for delay due to the Plaintiff’s credit loss.

The false contents of the report of this case are as follows.

① The Plaintiff prepared the instant report based on the false facts that a high level of salt salt is generated in the car-site supplied to B, which led to the occurrence of a bad faith, and that the gold-production produced by B would result in bad faith.

(hereinafter “instant assertion”). (2) A false statement on August 6, 2013, which was the date of preparation of the instant report.

(hereinafter “instant assertion” (hereinafter “instant assertion”). ③ The instant paper written “MADE INCHINA” that the Plaintiff supplied to B is false as it stated “MADE INCHINA,” and it is also false that the Chinese paper was supplied to B.

(hereinafter “instant assertion”) 2. Determination

A. 1) Whether the instant report is false or not: (a) the statement of the evidence No. 3 alone regarding the instant claim No. 1 is insufficient to acknowledge the instant assertion; and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it; (b) the instant argument is without merit. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement of evidence No. 2, the date of preparation of the instant report prepared by the Defendant on August 6, 2013, although it is true that the date of preparation of the instant report is different from the actual date.

arrow