The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative of the Kicheon-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City Development Bank Co., Ltd., 502, operated wholesale and retail businesses by using one full-time worker.

피고인은 위 사업장에서 2010. 8. 23.부터 2013. 6. 30.까지 근로하고 2013. 7. 1. 토ㅟ직한 D의 2012. 8. 상여금 100만 원, 2013. 4. 상여금 100만 원의 합계 200만 원과 퇴직금 1,776,606원을 당사자 간 지급기일 연장에 관한 합의 없이 퇴직일로부터 14일 이내에 지급하지 않았다.

2. In light of the judgment, the above facts charged are those falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 Subparag. 1 and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act, and Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent.

However, according to the letter of withdrawal of a petition, it can be recognized that the above worker withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the suit of this case. Thus, the indictment of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the