logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.16 2013고단2374
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as shown in the annexed sheet of criminal facts.

2. The case is one of the crimes under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits, which are not prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits.

However, according to the letter of withdrawal of the petition received by this court on May 3, 2013, workers B, C, and D can be acknowledged as the fact that they withdrawn the wishing to punish the Defendant on May 3, 2013, which was after the instant indictment was instituted.

3. Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow