beta
Text
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the Defendants among the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article
However, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance related to "the calculation table of damages" shall be amended in accordance with the attached Form 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.
The amount of damages calculation table [basic matters] case number A 2017Na114809, case number A 45 years old and 8 months old and 22 days old and 35.37 days old and 45.37 days old and 205-01-11 maximum working age (tax) 60 days after the date 2029-12-15 days old and 2029-160% of the total remaining disability: 0% of the total amount of 100% of the remaining disability: 0% of the total amount of 100% of the remaining disability, 23.00 of the permanent rehabilitation department (%) 23.23.00 of the daily unit price of actual income / 2060, 2015-21, 201, 2015-21, 201, 205-21, 2061,205-12,251-261,25.7
However, on September 7, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the lost income from March 12, 2016, following the day on which the Medical Care Period of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation is terminated due to the instant accident.
(A) Evidence No. 9, Plaintiff 11, 2017, the purport of the claim, and the ground for the claim, are stated in the Evidence No. 4). According to the Evidence No. 8, the agricultural labor wages of a male in 2016 can increase above that of the instant accident day by KRW 105,510 per day.
Therefore, in case where there is objective data which can clearly be predicted that the profit should be calculated on the basis of the profit at the time of the occurrence of a tort, or that the profit should be increased in the future, the profit to be increased in the future should also be considered in calculating the profit from the future. Therefore, Supreme Court Decision 7. 13, 1982.