The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On October 31, 2016, the Defendant, at around 14:08, held a temporary general meeting of the Association of Merchants in front of the C cafeteria located in the Daegu Northern-gu B market, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant classified the victim D as the president of the Association of Merchants and classified the victim D’s embezzlement of public funds into “confiscing, combining, and continuing to connect with the criminal.”

"Publicly insultingly insulting the victim by referring to the large interest."

B. On October 31, 2016, around 14:08, the Defendant, while carrying out an extraordinary general meeting of the merchants’ association in the B market located in the B market located in the Daegu Northern-gu B market, Daegu-gu B market, and the victim D is the president of the merchants’ association, and designated a female in relation to the embezzlement of public funds by the victim D as the victim’s president of the merchants’ association. The Defendant would not be able to attract and reflect upon the judgment of the court called the embezzlement of public funds.

그런 데도 빳빳하게 머리 쳐들고 다니면서 ‘ 나는 70만 원밖에 횡령 안 했다.

It is referred to as ".. there are people who bring about water in the market in connection with D at present, and the horse may be aware of why we continue to connect with the criminal."

The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out facts by speaking as “a large interest.”

2. Determination

A. The insult as referred to in the offense of insult as to the offense of insult as to the primary facts is not explicitly expressing the facts, but expressing an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that may undermine the people’s social evaluation (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Do1453, Dec. 23, 2005, etc.). In that context, “In harmony, I may not see why we continue to connect with the offender while being combined.”

Part “ and in particular, the phrase “offenders” is the merchants’ association of B market (hereinafter referred to as “the merchants’ association of this case”).

Since the case of embezzlement of public funds in the course of the president's position refers to the case of embezzlement of public funds, it is not possible to indicate the facts.