logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.11.21 2018나25199
소유권이전등기 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance while appealed from the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified even if the evidence and the purport of the whole argument were neglected.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court's reasoning is that the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance "C" is "the deceased C (hereinafter "the deceased"), and all the defendants "B" and the deceased are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the parts added below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In addition, following the second-class 16th judgment of the first instance court, the following shall be added:

A person shall be appointed.

D. On November 30, 1992, the Deceased’s adjudication of disappearance (Ulsan Family Court 2018 Ma1266) rendered on November 30, 199 on the expiration date of the period of disappearance was deemed deceased as of July 20, 2019 during the instant lawsuit. The Defendant, the deceased’s inheritor, took over the instant lawsuit.

A person shall be appointed.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow