logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고정168
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 2, 2015 to January 31, 2016, the Defendant was a person who was in office as the head of the F Team that promotes apartment community projects in the incorporated foundation E (hereinafter “ incorporated foundation”) that was entrusted with D’s duties from the head of the relevant incorporated foundation in order to be entrusted with D’s duties from the head of the relevant incorporated foundation in order to promote apartment community projects.

The Defendant, while promoting the construction of apartment infrastructure with the subsidy set at the F Team and the elderly leisure codow business, etc., paid the subsidy falsely as an allowance for the meeting, or received part of the subsidy paid as the lecture expenses from the mother G G name bank account used by the recipient and received a return of a part of the subsidy for his/her own use as the lecture expenses and received it for personal consumption.

1. On September 30, 2015, the accused of fraud against the victim incorporated foundation: I would like to the person in charge of the accounting department of the victim incorporated foundation at the office of the victim incorporated foundation in the victim incorporated foundation H located in the former North Haan-gun, Ha.

7.31.

8.5. &

8. 31. The 31. International Conferences related to education and operation stated that meeting allowances should be paid.

However, facts were that I did not attend the above conference and signed only on the list of participants, and there was no reason to pay the meeting allowance to I, and the defendant was to receive the meeting allowance paid to I and to pay I a meeting allowance to I for personal consumption.

On September 30, 2015, the Defendant had I deposit KRW 286,800 with I’s former bank account in the name of meeting allowance around 16:34, 2015, and had I, at around 19:10 on the same day, failed to accurately know the use of the above amount, again transfer the above amount to I bank account.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 18, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim J made a false statement to return KRW 186,80 to the victim J because he/she made a false statement.

However, the defendant is guilty.

arrow