All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 1) 사실오인 이 사건 공소사실 제1항에 관하여, 피고인은 지각하여 맞은편에서 달려오는 피해자의 오른쪽 팔목을 피고인의 오른손으로 가볍게 들어올리고 스쳐지나간 사실은 있으나, 두 손으로 피해자의 양손을 움켜잡고 계단 쪽으로 약 2미터 정도를 끌고 간 사실은 없다. 또한 이 사건 공소사실 제2항에 관하여, 피고인은 피해자에게 명찰이 삐뚤어졌다고 피해자가 단 명찰 부분을 가리키면서 손가락질을 한 사실은 있으나, 공소사실과 같이 피해자를 추행한 사실이 없다. 2) 양형부당 원심의 형(징역 6월, 집행유예 1년, 사회봉사명령 120시간, 성폭력 치료강의 수강명령 40시간)이 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. The Prosecutor’s above sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts

A. In light of the difference between the first instance court and the appellate court’s method of evaluating the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is clearly erroneous, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is clearly unreasonable considering the results of the first instance examination and the results of additional evidence examination conducted until the closing of argument in the appellate court, except in exceptional cases where it is deemed that maintaining the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is remarkably unfair, the appellate court should not reverse without permission the first instance judgment on the grounds that the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is different from the appellate court’s determination (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do5313, Jun. 14,