The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., in light of the fact that there is no benefit that the Defendant acquired, and that there is no benefit to the Defendant’s wrong, and that the imported camblopon (i.e., one, two years and six months) was discovered and seized by the customs office, and that the Defendant spopon (i.e., one, two years and six months), after the instant case, has been cut and extremely live, the sentence of imprisonment by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. There are circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that visualphones imported from the customs office were discovered and seized, the fact that the defendant seems to reflect his mistake, and the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed before about six years and then after the crime of this case is committed, however, as stated in the facts constituting the crime of this case, the crime of this case is to deliver approximately 0.06 g of philophones to the police officer in February 2007, and imported approximately 18.8 g of philophones in collusion with non-name on March 17, 1998; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a limited term of 1 year, 3 years of suspension of execution, 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on February 10, 200, 100 to the extent that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the same court on February 17, 200, 2000 to the same offense of this case; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the same court on February 28, 19, 20.