logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고정1066
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C became aware of the Defendant in borrowing money from the Defendant, and around June 2, 2014, upon the Defendant’s request, registered the SM7 car in its name and actually held by the Defendant, and entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. as the insured on the same day, and entered into a joint automobile insurance contract with the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. as the insured, and entered into a mutual agreement with the

On June 5, 2014, at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Apartment parking lot, the Defendant, the wife of the Defendant, caused a traffic accident in which E, while driving the MF7 car by negligence, was parked a F-owned car, and C, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the General Automobile Insurance Contract concluded with the victim Samsung F&M Co., Ltd., and caused a traffic accident, E would not be entitled to insurance benefits if it would cause a traffic accident, the Defendant and C would have caused a traffic accident while driving the vehicle, and attempted to receive the insurance money by reporting it falsely.

C On June 5, 2014, at around 16:02, at around 16:02, visited Hanosung Motor Vehicle Agent in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, and received an accident report by negligence that caused a traffic accident while driving the SM7 Motor Vehicle at around 10:0 on June 5, 2014. The Defendant visited the house of F, the owner of the damaged vehicle, and asked F children to speak that it is not a woman but a vehicle owner.

On June 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) deceiving Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. for the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.; and (b) demanded the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. to pay KRW 5 million to the vehicle maintenance business establishment under the name of repair cost for SM7 Passenger Vehicles; and (c) around June 23, 2014, paid KRW 919,400 under the name of F’s vehicle repair cost, etc., and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect C;

1. H. I.D.

arrow