logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.17 2013가합543994
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from August 29, 2014, with respect to Plaintiff A, KRW 27,215,040, KRW 17,143,360, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around August 5, 1976, the network C spreaded a will visa to Non-Indicted D at the office of the Unification Research Association around 11:00 on the first date of June 1976, stating, “On the first day of June 1976, it was the fact that, at the office of the Unification Research Association (hereinafter “instant Emergency Measures”), the security guard, under the premise that the head of the mother military group would flag in the front of July 197, under the premise that the head of the flag would collide with the helicopters, and thus, the E President would simultaneously fall into a collision with the helicopters and thus, all passengers died at the same time.”

(i) Presidential Emergency Measures (hereinafter referred to as “Emergency Measures No. 9”) for the national security and the protection of public order.

(2) On February 16, 197, in the case of Seoul District Criminal Court 76 Gohap963 decided Feb. 16, 1977, sentenced two years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications to two years, and sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications to one year and six months in the case of Seoul High Court 77No420 decided Jun. 1, 1977, the appellate court sentenced two years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications to one year and six months (hereinafter referred to as the “the judgment of the appellate court”).

(2) The deceased C appealed was arrested in the course of the investigation and trial as set forth in the preceding paragraph and detained for a total of 564 days from August 17, 1976 to March 3, 1978, while the appeal was dismissed in Supreme Court Decision 77Do2040 Decided September 13, 1977.

The deceased C was arrested as above, and was not given the opportunity to appoint a defense counsel and to defend himself/herself, was prevented from meeting and communication with the defense counsel or his/her family, and was subject to harsh acts such as tata and diving from the investigator of the Central Information Department during the period of detention, and was subject to her hurgical acts, such as hurging and hurging.

3) Meanwhile, from February 20, 1979 to December 5, 1979, the deceased C violated another emergency measure (hereinafter “afterward emergency measure violation”) following the completion of detention due to the instant emergency measure violation.

being detained and detained by the court, and on 199.

arrow