1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant 54,215,040 won against the plaintiff A and 36,143.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased C’s conviction and reinstatement 1) The deceased C’s “Emergency Measure for the National Security and the Protection of Public Order” (hereinafter “Emergency Measure No. 9”)

(2) On August 17, 1976, the defendant was detained on August 17, 1976, and was prosecuted on October 23, 1976. The summary of the facts charged is as follows. The defendant (the network C) knew that the act of catching, spreading, or distorted facts was prohibited by the Emergency Measure No. 9 enforced on May 13, 1975, the defendant fell from the defendant F in front of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Crifian department, and the defendant fell from the above defendant F in front of the Seoul Jongno-gu Crifian department, and the defendant fell from the above defendant F in front of the Crifician department, and the defendant fell from the above defendant F in front of the Crifician, and the President fell from the above defendant F in front of the Crifician, and the defendant fell from the above 17th of the Crifician, and instead, the defendant fell from the 97th of the Crifician, and the defendant did not have any reason for the collision between the Cr.

2) On February 16, 197, the network C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years and suspension of qualifications for the above facts charged in Seoul District Criminal Court 76Da963, 994 (merged), and on June 1, 197, Seoul High Court 77No420, which was the appellate court, sentenced to imprisonment for 1 year and 6 months and suspension of qualifications for 1 year and 1 year and 6 months (hereinafter the above appellate court judgment) and the network C appealed appealed appealed on September 13, 197, but the appeal was dismissed in Supreme Court 77Do2040 Decided September 13, 197.