logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.24 2013가합25663
손해배상
Text

1. Defendant C, Digitalcom Co., Ltd., and Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., respectively, KRW 133,324,611 to each Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant Digitalcom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Digitalcom”) is a company that sells products related to the brue and sexual surgery, which is a related company of the Defendant Daecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Daecom”).

On June 27, 2012, Defendant C and Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd”) concluded liability insurance for medical doctors and hospitals with Defendant C with each of the maximum amount of compensation and total amount of compensation as KRW 100,000,000, respectively.

Plaintiff

A is an assistant nurse who works for the F. F. S. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F.C. (hereinafter “Defendant Intervenor”).

Plaintiff

B is the mother of the Plaintiff A.

B. Around September 2012, Defendant Digitalcomer, including holding a product presentation session, decided to hold a product presentation session (hereinafter “instant product presentation session”) on October 16, 2012, which is the pen of the composition of the hylugic acid, imported by the said Defendant at the Scirotoon Sub-Skin conference room in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Samsungdong-163-1.

The product presentation was planned in the form that participants are accompanied by the resource who will undergo the operation and attend the lecture and witness the lecture.

Around September 19, 2012, Defendant B was provided with information on the presentation of the product of this case by Defendant B’s employees of Defendant B’s U.S., and was accompanied by the Plaintiff A, to be present at the presentation of the product of this case.

On October 15, 2012, Defendant C entered into a lecture agreement with Defendant Digitalcomer and decided to take charge of the actual procedure and education at the instant product presentation.

C. On October 16, 2012, the Plaintiff A and the Defendant Intervenor participated in the instant product presentation around 20:00.

arrow