Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are all “D” soldiers.

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime, at around 03:43 on January 15, 2017, opened a guest room not corrected by 707 of the F hotel located in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and intruded into the guest room, and stolen property worth KRW 2,654,000,000, in total, with the victim G’s market value of KRW 80,000,000, KRW 1,000,000, per man-made-type 1,50,000, per man-made-type 1,000,000, in total, KRW 1,50,000, in total, and KRW 2,654,00,00.

2. On January 15, 2017, Defendant A, at around 04:29, was cut off with the sum of KRW 502,00 in cash owned by the victim J, KRW 213,00 in cash owned by the victim K, and KRW 700,00 in the market value of KRW 1,485,00 in total when galloning gallon, Defendant A, who opened and intruded a guest room in Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu (hereinafter “Defendant A”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G, J, K, and L;

1. Each written statement of G, J, K, and L;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to analyzeCCTV images and to specify the date of crime);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of special larceny) and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of larceny at night)

B. Defendant B: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants in the suspension of execution: The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, committed larceny by intrusion into the lodging house in which the victims are locked, and thus, the nature of the instant crime is not good. However, the Defendants made confessions and reflects all of them, and compensate for damages.