logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016. 01. 14. 선고 2015누55655 판결
이 사건 부동산의 취득가액을 기준시가로 환산하여 양도소득세를 부과한 이 사건 처분은 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2014-Gu Group-30344 (No. 24, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

National High Court 2014J 1759 (2014.07.01)

Title

The disposition of this case imposing capital gains tax by converting the acquisition value of the real estate of this case into the standard market price is legitimate.

Summary

Since it is difficult to estimate the cost of new construction of the building of this case itself, in the end, the building of this case constitutes a case where it is impossible to confirm the actual transaction price at the time of acquisition.

Related statutes

Article 97 (Calculation of Necessary Expenses for Transfer Income)

Cases

Seoul High Court 2015Nu5655 Revocation of the imposition of capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

Loo

Defendant, Appellant

o Head of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Dismissal

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 24, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

January 14, 2016

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The transfer income tax reverted to the Plaintiff on September 9, 2013, which was rendered by the Defendant on September 9, 2013.

The imposition of KRW 000,000,000 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court's decision, except where "11,11,111 won" in the fourth 8th 8th son of the first instance court's decision is "22,22,222 won", and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.

arrow