The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, did not incur any injury to the victim by breaking the hacks of the hacks of the hacks of the hacks by using both descendants.

The defendant got back to his house because the defendant got down his her strings, and went back to his her father in the house, and the victim was faced by his her strings.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. In so doing, it erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the ground that the Defendant’s statement was consistent at the initial stage of the investigation, without inconsistency with the content of the statement itself, as well as consistent with objective evidence, such as the contents of the investigation report prepared by the police dispatched to the scene and the field photograph produced at the time of the investigation report prepared by the police, and the evidence in its holding, including the victim’s statement, can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant has inflicted bodily injury on the victim by spreading the victim beyond the locking the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case.

B. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is justified and it affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.