1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' preliminary claims added at the trial are dismissed.

3...

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Partial common areas" was added to the front part of "Partial common areas" in Section 4, Section 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "the primary reason for the claim is as preliminary claim, and the first floor parking lots of the complex of this case fall under officetels and commercial building owners' partial common areas. The defendants are controlling the parking activities of officetels and commercial building owners by attaching "the apartment parking spaces in the vicinity of the parking spaces of the above ground of second floor" in the above apartment parking spaces and exclusively managing the part of the parking spaces of this case. The defendants are prohibited from obstructing the acts such as the entry in the conjunctive purpose of the judgment of the court of first instance. The defendants were calculated from Section 4, Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance and Section 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and there is no further evidence that "the number of parking spaces for the complex of first floor and Chapter 2 was calculated as a whole," and the remaining parking lots of this case are found to be "the second floor parking lots of this case."

2. According to the conclusion, the plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance on the primary claims is consistent with this conclusion.