1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the defendant is the representative of the above apartment 36 unit.

B. On February 21, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice "36 representative case" (hereinafter "fact-finding case") containing false content that "the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won due to defamation or damage to documents" on the bulletin board of apartment complex and the elevator board of the Plaintiff and other members of the council of occupants' representatives of the said apartment complex with the aim of slandering the Defendant. On November 9, 2012, the Defendant issued a notice to the effect that "the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment of 50,000 won due to defamation or damage to documents" (hereinafter "fact-finding case") to the effect that "the Defendant removed 150,000 won from his/her accounting office without the resolution of the council of occupants' representatives" and "the Defendant removed 150,000 won from 60,000 won from 10,0000 won of the recording on April 21, 201."

(hereinafter “instant criminal complaint”) C.

With respect to the defendant's criminal complaint, the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office (Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office), on June 18, 2013, and (2), on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove that the notice alleged by the defendant was posted."