logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.12.05 2013고단6417
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

The defendant shall be KRW 150 million to D who is an applicant for compensation, and KRW 45 million to E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 1984, the Defendant came to know that the Defendant was working in Menek in Busan Jung-gu L while working in Penek.

Since then, the Defendant retired from the above rental car office, and worked at the mid-term rental office of the trade name "O" in Busan Jung-gu L, and began to work to discount bills by the mid-term rental business operator.

On December 12, 1991, the Defendant invested an amount equivalent to KRW 13 million in the bill discount and returned approximately KRW 200-3 million to N, thereby obtaining N’s belief.

From that point of time, N has started to collect money from the defendant and have the defendant receive money, and the defendant has been engaged in the business of lending his personal funds and N and N's funds.

After January 2009, when a bill was changed in the form of an electronic bill, the Defendant discontinued his/her business as a bill discount, but he/she had been willing to pay off his/her debt to N and other creditors including N with the intent to resolve the debt of KRW 100 million accumulated as much as he/she is unable to cope with. As such, he/she made a false statement as he/she continues his/her business as he/she continues to pay for the bill discount, and acquired money in the form of money as a bill discount, and received money from N and other creditors.

On July 14, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant’s house, “B is working at a discount on the bill of exchange of a large enterprise, and there is a lack of funds to pay the principal and interest, if it is lent money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not carry out the discount business of bills after January 2009, and was thought to repay N with the money borrowed from the victim, so even if she borrowed money from the victim, he/she paid the money as agreed.

arrow