logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고단1956
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

170,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to nine months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Incheon District Court on February 13, 201, and completed the execution of the above punishment on March 20, 2014 while serving in the Incheon Detention Center.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant 2015

4. At night around November, 11, 199, a single-use injection machine in front of the Mandong L in Incheon Nam-gu with approximately 0.2g of philophones was dried free of charge.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a person handling narcotics, he received psychotropic drugs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness N;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused or N by the prosecution;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment of a copy of the judgment of the official offender);

1. An investigation report (calculated as a suspect A additional collection charge);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records, investigation reports (a copy of the judgment of the same kind of crime as a suspect and personal identification records attached), [Attachment of the evidence and the evidence legitimately adopted and examined by this court; i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged that the Defendant met N at the time of recording the crime; ii) the Defendant divided the conversations related to N at the time of recording the crime into a philopon, such as a philopon market, but there was no delivery of a philopon to N. However, in the case of the Defendant, it is difficult to believe the statement as it is, on the other hand, because it is difficult to believe that there was credibility, such as making a statement to the effect that there was no medication, even though N was detected by Melopon, and that there was no change in detailed statements in light of various circumstances, such as the fact that N was subject to criminal punishment for receiving a philopon from the Defendant, such as the statement of the crime, etc., it is recognized that all the above criminal facts against the Defendant are guilty.

1. Article 1 of the Act on Criminal Matters and the selective management of narcotics;

arrow