logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고단1912
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized tobacco (meblus scarblus) 6 A (Evidence No. 1) to the victim C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on June 2, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 10, 2015, and is currently under probation period.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Larceny;

A. The Defendant, at around 01:00 on July 22, 2015, committed the crime against the victim D, citing: (a) on the front of the F convenience point located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul; (b) 2, 10,00 won 1, 2, 500 won 1, 2, 2, 2, 8,000 won 1, 500 won 3,00 won 2, 50,000 won 3,00 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 3,000 won 1,000 won 3,000 won 1,000 won 3,00 won 1,000 won .

B. around 02:00 on July 22, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim G: (a) on the front side of the restaurant of “I” located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) on the same day, the Defendant used approximately KRW 400,000 of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, located adjacent to the Victim G, under the influence of alcohol, and KRW 400,000 of the market price; (c) one cell phone of approximately KRW 50,000 of the market price; and (d) one cell phone of approximately KRW 50,000 of the market price; and (e) one cell phone of KRW 20,00 of the market price; and (e) one physical card of Korea, one student card, one driver’s license, etc.; and (e) a theft of approximately KRW 500,00 of the market price.

2. Fraud and violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. At around 01:20 on July 22, 2015, the Defendant, who used D’s Cze Card, purchased three cigarette 135,00 won in total at the market price at L convenience points operated by the victim K in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and carried out the above Cze Card as if the Defendant was the legitimate holder of the Cze Card, as described in paragraph (1) of Article 1, and had an employee under whose name the Cze Card was presented and prepared sales slips.

As above, the defendant deceivings employees of the above convenience store and belongs to it.

arrow