The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the victim B on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the part of the violation of the Child Welfare Act on March 7, 2018 and the part of the violation of the Child Welfare Act on March 7, 2018 against the victim C, and on March 7, 2018 against the victim C.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on physical and emotional abuse in the crime of violating the Child Welfare

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.