Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2016. 8. 10. 20:10 경 포항시 북구 중흥로 255번 길 25, ' 빌라 맨션' 나 동 출입구 앞에서 피해자 B이 자신을 쳐다보기에 같이 쳐다봤더니 피해자가 " 뭘 쳐다봐 "라고 했다는 이유로 손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들며 팔을 잡아 비틀고, 머리를 벽 쪽으로 수회 밀어 붙여 부딪히게 하고, 바닥에 밀쳐 넘어뜨렸다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim due to the brue spine, bones, and other conical signboards accompanied by the neute ppuri disease during two weeks.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and time as in the preceding paragraph, set up against the victim A’s above acts, thereby putting the victim’s booming the victim’s booming and threatening him to drinking.

In this respect, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim with salt, tension, vertebranes, vertebra, and astronomical rootss of the troke during the 2 week period.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The witness B (Defendant A) and E respective legal statements;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (as to photographs of damaged parts), a report on investigation (as to attachment of a report on injury to a suspect A), a report on investigation (as to attachment of a confirmation document submitted by a suspect B and a certificate of rescue and emergency medical services

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant B and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate act or a legitimate defense, because it is merely a trace of the Defendant’s shoulder as a means of resistance to protect and escape from the unilateral illegal attack of Defendant A.