logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.05.12 2016고단777
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant maintained the relationship with the victim C from July 2013 to March 18, 2016.

1. On March 26, 2016, the Defendant destroyed property: (a) around 23:30 on March 26, 2016, the E Apartment 420, the house of the victim in D; (b) the victim in D refused to meet and avoid his/her contact; (c) the Defendant called “the password of the house inside shall be lost, replaced with a new entrance lock”; and (d) the Defendant sent a phone call to F, the key business operator in the neighborhood, thereby allowing F, who believed the horse, to remove the entrance of the victim already installed and install a new lock.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim with a substantial amount of 1.20,000 won in the city.

2. The Defendant continued to enter the password of the entrance, which was newly installed as set out in paragraph 1, with the victim’s house as set out in paragraph 1, and opened the door and intrudes on the house’s residence.

"2016 Highest 871"

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant opened an apartment building No. 420, the Defendant: (a) in front of the victim’s office in the E apartment building No. 420 at the time of 2015, the Defendant: (b) removed the portrait by hand on the ground that the victim did not open the door; (c) destroyed the portrait so that the repair cost could not be known; (d) 1.20,000 won of the entrance door kk by hand; and (e) destroyed the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant: (a) around the new wall of 2015, the victim’s house was frightened, and (b) the he she was frightened in the victim’s horse with a string that the market price cannot be known at the victim’s horse.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

3. On March 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the time of the first step of the new wall on March 2016, and (b) at the time of the victim’s sexual intercourse, and (c) at the end of the victim.

arrow