A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (n, 34 years of age) are related to each other.

Around 02:40 on February 6, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that he had a bad speech at a drinking house, while drinking alcohol at a drinking house. A police officer who received the report and voluntarily accompanied the police officer, who received the report, was investigated at Samsung Police Station.

On the other hand, the defendant had the clothes of the defendant at the victim's house, and after the following day, he planned the parent of the victim to look at the victim's house, and entered the victim's house in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 301, which is the house of the victim's house.

1. From February 6, 2016, around 05:00 on February 6, 2016, the Defendant, who intruded with a special residence, carried out a password of the electronic locks before the entrance of the said victim, but the victim did not open the door and did not receive the Defendant’s telephone without opening the door.

Accordingly, the Defendant saw the net value ( approximately 30 cm in total length) that is dangerous goods stored in the Defendant’s vehicle, and opened the entrance door and opened the door in order of the entrance door and the electronic lock.

Accordingly, the Defendant carried dangerous articles as above and infringed upon the victim’s residence.

2. The Defendant damaged special property: (a) was incidental to the victim’s house access locked locked, using a net, which is a dangerous object, such as the foregoing paragraph 1, and was accompanied by the victim’s house locked; and (b) continued to enter the victim’s room, and (c) the son owned by the victim and the son attached to the son.

Accordingly, the Defendant carried dangerous goods as above and destroyed each of the victim’s locked electronic locks, i.e., phiphones, and i.e., the victim’s market price.

3. The defendant is entitled to call from the victim within the scope of the victim at the same time as the above paragraph 1.