logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015. 3. 17. 선고 2014가합71548 판결
[[소멸시효연장을위한]대여금반환청구의소][미간행]
Plaintiff

Plaintiff (Attorney Lee Byung-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant

Defendant

Conclusion of Pleadings

Pleadings without Oral Proceedings

Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 160,00,000 won and 60,000,000 won from May 1, 1997; 100,000,000 won with 5% per annum from May 16, 1997 to September 14, 2004; and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

Purport of claim

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

Claim for the interruption of prescription of a claim established by a judgment in this Court against the defendant in this Court Decision 2003Gahap15269 decided Nov. 11, 2004

2. Applicable provisions;

Articles 208(3)1 and 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment without Oral Proceedings)

Judge Seo-man (Presiding Judge)

arrow