(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.24 2019고정756

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.24 2019고정756

명예훼손등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018, and from December 17, 2018 to December 17, 2018, the defendant is the representative of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives, and the victim D works as the head of the management office of the above apartment from January 13, 2017.

1. Defamation;

A. A. On August 2017, a victim of the crime related to KRW 2.750,00,00,00, including the cost of construction of excellent pipes, requested a resolution of the council of occupants' representatives to designate the above investigation cost of KRW 2.755,00,00 as a reserve fund on August 25, 2017 and the head of the council of occupants' representatives to use the same as the investigation cost of KRW 2.755,00,00 from the council of occupants' representatives on August 23, 2017, and August 25, 2017. After the council of occupants' representatives decided on September 26, 2017 to pay KRW 2.755,00,000 to the head of the council of occupants' representatives who attended the council of occupants' representatives as the representative of the council of occupants' representatives to use the same investigation cost of KRW 2.755,000 as a reserve fund on October 31, 2017.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had undermined the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as if the victim had carried out funds more than twice as follows.

(1) On March 28, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime of March 28, 2018, around 19:30 on March 28, 2018, 2018, referred to the victim who is the chief management officer in the regular council of occupants' representatives held in the council of occupants' representatives of the 1st underground floor of the above apartment complex, among those having the president, the Speaker pro tempore, the representative of the Dong, the auditor, and the witness.

Therefore, it is necessary to say that the business is 300,000 won, more than 50,000 won, and that the actual performance of construction is low.

In addition, if the Nitter works for Korea at the last time, the Nitter's opinion on the audit or the representative of Korea.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2019.08.20 2018나54746

-서울서부지방법원 2019.01.22 2017가단21964

-수원지방법원 2017.10.25 2017나56056

-서울북부지방법원 2019.09.25 2018나39325

-부산지방법원 2019.05.23 2019고정526