A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 7, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million on November 25, 2014 by a fine of KRW 3 million in the above court due to the same offense in the case of a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking) and a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) by the Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court.

On March 28, 2017, the Defendant driven a DK7 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in a state of alcohol content of about 0.110% while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 1km from around 9th, Young-dong, Young-dong to the roads in front of the same Doo-dong DC-dong.

As a result, the Defendant once or more times driven a motor vehicle without a driver's license while under the influence of alcohol.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act, fabrication of private documents, uttering of a falsified document, forgery of a private signature, forgery of a signature, and the Defendant’s signature uttering of the above investigation: the date and time stated in paragraph 1; the time and time, the police officer E, who was a police officer belonging to the NF police station, who was under the influence of drinking at the place, was discovered to be suspected of driving alcohol and was asked to produce a driver’s license; accordingly, the Defendant was willing to be exempted from criminal punishment by driving as if he was F.

Defendant, while having no identification card, was going to E with a usual appearance.

F’s resident registration number (G) of F, and the name of F was written in the driver’s name column, “breath measurement and blood collection notification letter,” and “Simman’s letter,” and the above signature and document were authenticly written to E who knew that the signature and document were forged.

Accordingly, the Defendant used F’s resident registration number unlawfully, and forged F’s signature in F’s name, which is a private document on proof of fact, and used F’s “written confirmation of blood consumption and blood collection” and “proving letter,” and forged F’s signature in F’s statement report on the state driver’s circumstances, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;