1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is an unincorporated association that is established on December 2, 1999 and ordinarily employs about 10 workers and manages A apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a person who joined the Plaintiff on August 11, 2016 and worked as the Director of the Management Office.

B. On December 13, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the Intervenor that the Intervenor will be dismissed from office for the following reasons:

(hereinafter “instant dismissal”) No. 1. 1. The Director of the Management Office of the apartment of the Party who returned to Korea, should provide “the assistance in the operation of the council of occupants’ representatives and the election commission pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act” pursuant to Article 30(1)2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act, but rather interfere with business

2. The "execution of the matters resolved by the council of occupants' representatives" under Article 63 (1) 6 of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act and Article 64 (4) of the same Act "the head of the management office shall perform his/her duties with due care as a good manager" shall actively cooperate in the duties of the council of occupants' representatives, but rather, the election commission posted to occupants, etc., and the 8th council of occupants' representatives without permission, instructed the managers to remove the notices of the

3. The action of He/she violates Article 13(1), (2), (4), and (6) of the Rules of Employment, and falls under Article 62(1) of the Rules of Employment, and he/she requests the attendance of the council of occupants' representatives on December 9, 2016 to hear the vindication of the chief of the management office at 7:00 p.m. on December 13, 2016, he/she shall be deemed to have refused to give an explanation, and shall be deemed to have dismissed the chief of the management office on December 13, 2016.

Finally.

The Intervenor asserts that the dismissal of the instant case is unfair and unfair to the Jeonbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission on December 13, 2016.