The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Around 13:40 on September 18, 2014, the Defendant committed an assault with the victim D (the age of 52) who was the head of the above apartment management office in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, on the ground that there was a large amount of management expenses at the management office of the apartment complex 11 complex, which was committed by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness D and E respective legal statements;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Submission of a written diagnosis of injury of a victim);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. The non-guilty portion of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the first offender, the circumstances leading the Defendant to commit the instant crime; and (ii) the damage incurred by the instant crime is minor) of the suspended sentence

1. On September 18, 2014, the summary of this part of the facts charged was that the Defendant had made a large amount of management expenses at the 11 complex management office of Ansan-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul apartment complex (hereinafter referred to as the “11-year old apartment complex management office”) around September 13:40, 2014, and thus, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Defendant, who was the head of the above apartment management office, brought about the victim’s neck by hand and was in need of a approximately seven-day treatment for the victim.

2. We examine the judgment, 1. The victim D, the head of the management office, stated in the investigative agency and the court that he did not actively respond to the defendant's neck while she gets her hand, and that he did not receive any other treatment even when she went to the hospital, and that he was absent from office or was not retired from office due to medical treatment or pain, and that E, who was in accounting, was in the above victim's title that the defendant was seated with the suspect in the court, but the victim stated that he did not appeal the pain while working for the hospital once after the case.