1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, is to be cited in this case as stated in paragraph (2), and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to be cited, except for the addition of the judgment on the newly raised argument by the plaintiff in this court, as stated in paragraph (3). As such, this is to be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. The parts of the 2nd 8 to 12 lines used or added shall be dried as follows:

“B. C Cooperatives (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Cooperatives”)

) 47 small and medium enterprises producing concrete products, such as PHC files, fume, and electric poles (the end of 2014 large enterprises were also members of the company) were members.

(1) The members who produce PHC files are non-profit corporations consisting of 17 companies, including the Plaintiff (1) and 17 companies, including the Plaintiff (1) and the Plaintiff (2, 2, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Y, 6, K limited liability companies, L limited liability companies, 8, M&, 9 N corporation, 10, 100, P, 100, 1000, P, 100, Q, Q, 13, 100, 100, 1000, 1000, 1000,0000,000,000).

c. . . . . . . ... .... ... .... 3 by inserting “as described in Appendix 1” in the front of the part “26 bid awarded by the Plaintiff” and inserting “as regards the Plaintiff” in the front of the part “24 months’s limitation of participation in tendering” in the third and lower part, and inserting at the end of the third and lower half:

E. In this case, the defendant's facts constituting the crime of this case are "the part of 13,696,437,357 won distributed to the plaintiff according to the principle of allocation of shares of the joint supply and demand company to the members by the bidding awarded the contract of this case."