logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.06.27 2013고정392
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2013 high-level 392” from November 29, 2012 to November 19:15, 2012, takes care of the victim D’E restaurant operated by the victim D in Seopo-si C without any justifiable reason.

The purpose of this study is to prevent the victim from running the restaurant business by putting the 15-minute scam and scambling the scam to the table by placing the scam to the table with the large interest of "Scams, police scamscamscamscams, Balamscams, gamscams, shamscams, shamscams, shamscams, shamscamscams, shamscamscams, etc. on the table.

The Defendant, “2013 Highly 393”, as the owner of a G office building located in the F of Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, he received KRW 3 million a year from September 2009 to September 2012, and leased the said G office to the victim H.

At around 20:20 on November 18, 2012, the victim did not conclude the lease contract again or have an office unfolded even though the term of the office lease expires, and the defendant did not interfere with the victim's exercise of rights against the above building by destroying three entrance entrance entrance entrance doors, one shock network, and three glass windows around the front.

Summary of Evidence

"2013, 392"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Relevant photographs "2013, 392";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 323 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime (a point of agreement with a victim of interference with business);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow