A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 2009, the Defendant had been engaged in the manufacturing and wholesale business of clothing with the trade name “D” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from September 3, 2009, with the intent of lending money from another person who is difficult to operate the business.

around August 10, 2011, the Defendant is obliged to lend labor expenses to the said victim from “G” operated by the Victim F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu E, and the Defendant is obliged to lend labor expenses to the said victim.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, from the beginning of the manufacture and wholesale of clothing, the defendant had no intention or ability to make a change in the price, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, since he/she did not properly receive money from the customer, he/she did not have any intention or ability to make a change in the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim, and received 85 million won in total, including 25 million won for the purchase cost of the original unit on November 12, 201, under the name of labor cost for the same day from the above victim, as well as 30 million won for labor cost on November 15, 201, and 15 million won for the purchase cost of the original unit on November 15, 201, and 25 million won for the purchase cost of the original unit on December 15, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the above victim, thereby taking the property from the victim.

2. On August 201, 201, the Defendant, at a place where it is difficult to know a place where a police officer cannot be found, sent a telephone to the victim H, who is the husband of the victim of the above Paragraph 1, to pay off the Defendant who lent KRW 20 million as the purchase cost of the original team and the labelling, the office operating expenses.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, since the defendant borrowed money from the victim H in the situation like Paragraph 1, there was no intention or ability to change it at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim H, and was issued 10 million won around August 17, 201 from the above victim.

This is the defendant.