logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.05.22 2014고단619
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around 16:00 on December 21, 2013, the Defendant driven B le-car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.113% under the influence of alcohol at a section of about 4 km from the literature-type ginseng distance in the Mapo-Eup in Gwangju-si to the front of the Pakistan located in the same Eup/Myeon.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents) as stated in paragraph (1) and driving the said car at the time stated in paragraph (1), led directly to a sudden exhaustion from the surface of the mouth of the road at the entrance of the Panpo-Eup in Gwangju City, which is located in 351-2.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle by properly operating it.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, caused the part of the victim C (the 44-year-old) who was in the atmosphere signaled at the front of the horse at the time and the part of the victim C (the 44-year-old) driving to be the part of the front of the said ready-light vehicle, and subsequently, caused the said rocketing passenger vehicle to be pushed ahead in the future, and caused the collision of the lower part of the victim E (the 36-year-old driver) driving in the front signal at the victim E(the 36-year-old driver), which was in the front of the traffic at the front of the said two-lane, and the Defendant immediately escaped in the second two-lane, and the part of the victim G (the 35-year-old driver)’s left part of the victim G (the 35-year-old passenger vehicle) and the victim I driver’s self-driving collision with each other.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim C and E to suffer bodily injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in each two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, caused the victim G to suffer bodily injury, such as post-definite salt, etc., which requires approximately two-day medical treatment.

arrow